Scientists Warn of 5G Health Effects…

19 Nov 2018

Scientists Warn of #5G Health Effects Washington DC Council 5G Small Cell Roundtable … Special Thanks to: Youtube.com/watchehtrust

 

Scientists Warn of 5G Health Effects Washington DC Council 5G Small Cell Roundtable

Scientists Warn of #5G Health Effects Washington DC Council 5G Small Cell Roundtable … Special Thanks to: Youtube.com/watchehtrustResearch Stop5G.net … Like: Fb.me/Stop5G … Join: Fb.com/groups/Stop5G thnx (y)References on 5G and it's Dangerous Effects:https://www.saferemr.com/2018/11/NTP-final-reports31.html—NTP Cell Phone Radiation Study: Final Reportshttp://www.emrpolicy.org/litigation/case_law/docs/noi_epa_response.pdf— EPA Radiation Protection Division Norbert Hankin on FCC exposure limitshttp://www.iemfa.org/wp-content/pdf/2017-09-13-Scientist-Appeal-5G-Moratorium.pdf— EU appeal:“Scientists and doctors warn of potential serious health effects of 5G”http://www.ntia.doc.gov/files/ntia/us_doi_comments.pdf— U.S. Department of Interior comments on FirstNet, February 7, 2014https://projectcensored.org/4-how-big-wireless-convinced-us-cell-phones-and-wi-fi-are-safe/— “#4 How Big Wireless Convinced Us Cell Phones and Wi-Fi are Safe”, October 2, 2018https://www.thenation.com/article/how-big-wireless-made-us-think-that-cell-phones-are-safe-a-special-investigation/— “How Big Wireless Made Us Think That Cell Phones Are Safe: A Special Investigation” April 23, 2018http://www.newsweek.com/migratory-birds-bee-navigation-5g-technologyelectromagnetic-radiation-934830— “Radiation from cell phones, wifi are hurting the birds and the bees; 5g may make it worse”, May 2018 – on EKLIPSE reviewhttps://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2018/05/17/electromagnetic-radiation-power-lines-phone-masts-poses-credible/— “Electromagnetic radiation from power lines and phone masts poses ‘credible’ threat to wildlife, report finds”, May 2018 – on EKLIPSE reviewhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013935118300355https://www.emfacts.com/2018/08/martin-palls-book-on-5g-is-available-online/— “5G: Great risk for EU, U.S. and International Health! Compelling Evidence for Eight Distinct Types of Great Harm Caused by Electromagnetic Field (EMF) Exposures and the Mechanism that Causes Them”, Martin Pall PhD, June 2018https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/reveh.2016.31.issue-3/reveh-2016-0011/reveh-2016-0011.xml— European Academy of Environmental Medicine, “EUROPAEM EMF: Guideline 2016 for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of EMF-related health problems and illnesses” (based on a 2012 report from the Austrian Medical Association)Maximum Freedomhttp://www.sccma-mcms.org/Portals/19/Wireless%20Silent%20Spring%20%20SCCMA%20Oct%202018 %20%20Final%20PDF_1.pdf— “Wireless Silent Spring”, Cindy Russell MD, SCCMA Bulletin, Sept./Oct. 2018https://olis.leg.state.or.us/liz/2013I1/Downloads/CommitteeMeetingDocument/42624http://tinyurl.com/OregonReview— “Biological and Health Effects of Microwave Radio Frequency Transmissions: A Review of the Research Literature”, Paul Dart MD (lead author), June 3, 2013https://www.diagnose-funk.org/download.php?field=filename&id=103&class=DownloadI tem— “Increasing incidence of burnout due to magnetic and electromagnetic fields of cell phone networks and other wireless communication technologies” Ulrich Warnke, Peter Hensingerhttps://ehtrust.org/internet-things-poses-human-health-risks-scientists-question-safety-un tested-5g-technology-international-conference/https://youtu.be/VuVtGldYXK4— Expert Forum: Wireless Radiation and Human Health, Hebrew University Medical School, January 23-26, 2017, NIH co-sponsored conference; 5G health riskshttp://competence-initiative.net/KIT/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/ki_beesbirdsandmankind_screen.pdf— “Birds, Bees and Mankind: Destroying Nature by Electrosmog”, Ulrich Warnkehttp://moef.nic.in/downloads/public-information/final_mobile_towers_report.pdf— Government of India: Report on Possible Impacts of Communication Towers on Wildlife including Birds and Bees, October 2011http://sccounty01.co.santa-cruz.ca.us/bds/Govstream/BDSvData/non_legacy/agendas/2012/20120124/PDF/041.pdf— Memorandum to the Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors: “Health risks associated with Smart Meters”, Santa Cruz County Health Officer Poki Stewart Namkung MD, January 13, 2012 – p. 9-18https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/7022117660.pdfComments to the FCC, Susan Foster MSW, February 2, 2013 – on firefighter studyhttps://www.saferemr.com/2018/01/national-toxicology-program-peer-public.html— National Toxicology Program: Peer & public review of cell phone radiation study reportshttps://www.saferemr.com/2017/09/5g-wireless-technology-is-5g-harmful-to.html— 5G Wireless Technology: Is 5G Harmful to Our Health?https://emfscientist.org/— International EMF appeal by scientists and physicians, 2012http://microwavenews.com/news-center/ntp-nyt— “Setting the Record Straight on NTP Cell Phone Cancer Study: Ron Melnick Corrects ‘Misinformation,’ Rebuffed by the New York Times”, June 10, 2016https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013935118300367?via%3Dihubhttp://microwavenews.com/news-center/more-coincidence— “Report of final results regarding brain and heart tumors in Sprague-Dawley rats exposed from prenatal life until natural death to mobile phone radiofrequency field representative of a 1.8 GHz GSM base station environment. World "Health" Organization (W.H.O.) Un-Corruptible? … World Health Organization, radiofrequency radiation and health – a hard nut to crack (Review) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5504984/ .Radiofrequency radiation from nearby base stations gives high levels in an apartment in Stockholm, Sweden: A case report:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5920374/ .The Advisory Group on Non-ionising Radiation (AGNIR) 2012 report forms the basis of official advice on the safety of radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic fields in the United Kingdom and has been relied upon by health protection agencies around the world. This review describes incorrect and misleading statements from within the report, omissions and conflict of interest, which make it unsuitable for health risk assessment. The executive summary and overall conclusions did not accurately reflect the scientific evidence available. Independence is needed from the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP), the group that set the exposure guidelines being assessed. This conflict of interest critically needs to be addressed for the forthcoming World Health Organisation (WHO) Environmental Health Criteria Monograph on Radiofrequency Fields. Decision makers, organisations and individuals require accurate information about the safety of RF electromagnetic signals if they are to be able to fulfil their safeguarding responsibilities and protect those for whom they have legal responsibility. .https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27902455 .More science to do real research: http://stop5g.whynotnews.eu/?page_id=522

Posted by Stop5G on Saturday, 1 December 2018